梭子蟹科线粒体基因组特征与系统发育遗传分析

    Mitochondrial genome characteristics and phylogenetic analysis in Portunidae

    • 摘要:目的】线粒体基因在物种鉴定、起源和进化研究中展现出较高的效率和准确性,目前已有23种梭子蟹完成了线粒体全基因组测序,但基于比较基因组学方法对梭子蟹科线粒体进行基因组特征及系统进化关系的研究仍较少。本研究旨在探究梭子蟹科(Portunidae)蟹类的线粒体基因组特征,筛选适用于梭子蟹科物种快速鉴定的分子标记,并阐明梭子蟹科的系统发育关系。【方法】采用比较基因组学方法,对23种梭子蟹的线粒体全基因组序列进行分析。通过差异位点分析筛选物种快速鉴定的分子标记,并基于13个蛋白质编码基因(PCGs)的核苷酸序列,运用最大似然法(ML)和贝叶斯推断法(BI)构建系统发育树,同时进行分歧时间估算。【结果】梭子蟹科线粒体基因组具有高度保守性,未发现基因重排现象,且表现出显著的AT偏好性。选择压力分析显示,13个PCGs的Ka/Ks比值均在0到1之间,表明这些基因均受到纯化选择作用。差异位点分析显示,nad5、nad4和rrnl基因因其较长的序列长度和较高的变异位点比例,可作为梭子蟹科物种快速鉴定的理想分子标记。系统发育分析表明,光背蟹属(Lissocarcinus)、狼牙蟹属(Lupocycloporus)、单梭蟹属(Monomia)、梭子蟹属(Portunus)、青蟹属(Scylla)、蟳属(Charybdis)及美青蟹属(Callinectes)7个属均为单系群,双额短桨蟹(Thalamita sima)未与短浆蟹属(Thalamita)聚为一支,而是与蟳属(Charybdis)关系更密切,这一结果得到遗传距离分析的支持。分歧时间估算结果显示,梭子蟹科的起源至少可追溯至三叠纪,其中光背蟹属是较为古老的一支,现存梭子蟹大多分化自古进系。【结论】23种梭子蟹线粒体基因组较保守,其中nad5nad4以及rrnl基因是梭子蟹科物种快速鉴定的理想分子标记。在系统发育树中,短浆蟹属呈现出非单系群的分布特征。本研究结果为梭子蟹科物种的快速鉴定、遗传进化研究及分歧时间推断提供了重要的理论依据和数据支持。

       

      Abstract: Objective Mitochondrial genes have proven to be highly effective and precise tools for species identification, origin tracing, and evolutionary research. Although complete mitochondrial genomes of 23 species in Portunidae have been sequenced, comparative genomic analyses of mitochondrial genome characteristics and phylogenetic relationships within this family remain limited. This study aims to investigate the mitochondrial genome features of species in Portunidae, identify molecular markers suitable for rapid species identification, and elucidate the phylogenetic relationships within the family. Methods Comparative genomics approaches were applied to analyze the complete mitochondrial genomes of 23 species in Portunidae. Polymorphic site analysis was conducted to screen molecular markers for rapid species identification. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) based on nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), alongside divergence time estimation. Results The mitochondrial genomes of species in Portunidae exhibited high structural conservation with no gene rearrangements and significant AT bias. Selection pressure analysis revealed that all 13 PCGs underwent purifying selection. Polymorphic site analysis identified nad5, nad4, and rrnl as ideal molecular markers for rapid species identification due to their longer sequence lengths and higher proportions of variable sites. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated monophyly in seven genera, including Lissocarcinus and Lupocycloporus. Notably, Thalamita sima clustered more closely with Charybdis than with its nominal genus Thalamita, a result supported by genetic distance analysis. Divergence time estimation suggested that species in Portunidae originated no later than the Triassic period, with Lissocarcinus representing an ancient lineage, while most extant species diverged during the Paleogene. Conclusions The mitochondrial genomes of 23 species in Portunidae species are evolutionarily conserved. The nad5, nad4, and rrnl genes serve as effective molecular markers for rapid species identification, and the genus Thalamita exhibits non-monophyletic clustering in the phylogenetic tree. This study provides crucial theoretical foundations and datasets for rapid species identification, evolutionary studies, and divergence time estimation in Portunidae, advancing our understanding of their phylogenetic framework and evolutionary history.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回